Petitioner filed a writ petition. The Court held the petition was infructuous on the advice of counsel and disposed of the matter without further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 672.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2023
Sandip Bhujangrao Gore .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Ramesh Dhakane, Advocate Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. W. Mundhe, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 21ST JUNE, 2023.
PER COURT :
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]
bsb/June 23
Sandip Bhujangrao Gore
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
