Dismissed

Avinash Namdev Aanbhule v. the State of Maharashtra through the Honble Minister and Others

Bombay HC19 Jun 2023WP/6457/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a fraudulent certificate issued to Respondent No.8 alleging fraud by authorities. High Court refused writ relief regarding private dispute, disposed petition directing CEO to handle representation with due process and hearing.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; Petitioner directed to approach CEO for representation with opportunity of hearing.

Avinash Namdev Aanbhule Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

24 WRIT PETITION NO.6457 OF 2023

¶4

AVINASH NAMDEV AANBHULE
VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE HONBLE MINISTER
AND OTHERS

¶6

Mr.Kishor R.Doke, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.V.M.Kagne, AGP for the Respondent/State.

¶7

DATE : JUNE 19, 2023

¶8

PER COURT:

¶9

1. The Petitioner's application tendered to Respondent No.5,

¶10

CEO, Z.P. Osmanabad alleges that Respondent No.6 has fraudulently
manufactured a certificate, which is termed as a "Work done and work
in hand" certificate. As the said certificate is fraudulently
manufactured, purportedly issued by the Sub Divisional Engineer,
Gramin Pani Poorawatha, Zilla Parishad, Sub Division, Bhoom, the
Petitioner approached the said Authority through a Member of the
Standing Committee of the Zilla Parishad. By communication dated
20.02.2023, the Sub-Divisional Engineer informed the said Member of

¶11

khs/June 2023/6457

¶12

the Zilla Parishad that no such certificate has been issued by the said
authority in favour of Respondent No.8. Grievance of the Petitioner is
that the registration certificate of Respondent No.8 as a Contractor of
the Zilla Parishad, should be revoked by the Osmanabad Zilla Parishad.

¶13

2.Considering the above and keeping in view that a private
dispute is between the Petitioner and a private individual i.e.
Respondent No.8, we would not be entertaining this petition.
However, the Petitioner submits that he has approached the CEO, Zilla
Parishad vide communication dated 27.01.2023 praying for cancellation
of the certificate of Respondent No.8.

¶14

3.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off. Let
Respondent No.5 deal with the representation of the Petitioner dated
27.01.2023 by following the due procedure laid down in Law and by
granting an opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders.

¶15

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶16

khs/June 2023/6457

Avinash Namdev Aanbhule v. the State of Maharashtra through the Honble Minister and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash Namdev Aanbhule v. the State of Maharashtra through the Honble Minister and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhava Jankranti Sanghatna Maharashtra through Its President Sharad Ukha Pawar Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nivrutti Kisan Sadgar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mahananda Dashrath Thorat Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Indubai Janardan Shinde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Bagwat Rama Bangar Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Dnyaneshwar Narayan Chavan Vs the District Collector Beed and Others