Disposed

Vinod S/O Ramkrushna Gaurkar v. S. T. Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Ass. Commissioner/Vice President and Others

Bombay HC2 May 2023WP/630/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a notice requiring a validity certificate for a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidates. His tribe claim had been rejected. Court directed no adverse action for four weeks while petitioner challenges the rejection order.

What did the court decide?

Directed that for four weeks no adverse action be taken on account of invalidation of tribe claim.

Vinod S/O Ramkrushna Gaurkar Vs S. T. Caste… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 WP-630-2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

Writ Petition No.630 of 2023

¶4

Vinod S/o Ramkrushna Gaurkar

¶5

Versus

¶6

Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and others

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Shri M.V. Bute, Counsel for Petitioner.
Shri A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.
Shri N.D. Khamborkar, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.

¶10

DATE : May 2, 2023 .

¶11

1.The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the notice issued by the
respondent No.3-Society to the petitioner to submit the validity certificate since
the petitioner was appointed on a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe candidate.
2.While issuing notice in this writ petition, the learned Assistant
Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 was directed to obtain instructions
as to when the petitioner’s tribe claim will be verified.

¶12

3.The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that the
claim of the petitioner has been rejected on 22-2-2023 by the Scrutiny
Committee and his tribe certificate has been invalidated.

¶13

4.In view of aforesaid, it will be necessary for the petitioner to challenge the
order of the Scrutiny Committee. Since the petitioner is in employment since
30-9-1997, it is directed that for a period of four weeks from today no adverse
action be taken against the petitioner on account of invalidation of his tribe
claim.

¶14

5.With liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of the Scrutiny
Committee dated 22-2-2023, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶15

(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.)

¶16

Digitally Signed By :P D LANJEWAR Signing Date:02.05.2023 19:24

¶17

LANJEWAR

Vinod S/O Ramkrushna Gaurkar v. S. T. Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Ass. Commissioner/Vice President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod S/O Ramkrushna Gaurkar v. S. T. Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Ass. Commissioner/Vice President and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Sejal Rajesh Kewat Thr. Her Natural Guardian, Shri. Rajesh Babulal Kewat Vs District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secy.

All India Reporter Karmachari Sangh, through Its Secretary, K.B. Ambokar Vs All India Reporter Pvt. Ltd, Nagpur through Managing Director Sumant Wadiyadhar Chaitaley and Ors.

Ashokrao Marotrao Nagpure and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mumbai and Others

Sandip S/O Sahebrao Tekade and Another Vs the Collector, Akola and Others

Rajani Ramchandra Dhongade Vs the Education Officer (Sec.), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur and Another

Gandhi Gram Womens B.Ed College, Indira Bahu. Mahila Vikas Sanstha, Thr. Pre. Dr. Sunita R. Shende Vs Government of Maha., Thr. Joint Secretary, Dept. of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.