Disposed

Nida Ahmed Ali Sayyad v. the Union of India through Finance Department and Others

Bombay HC12 Jun 2023WP/6140/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge order addresses a writ petition challenging a bank's rejection of the petitioner's education loan application. The petitioner was informed that the application could not proceed without a co-applicant possessing an acceptable credit score, as previous co-applicants were defaulters. The court disposed of the petition with leave for the petitioner to submit a fresh application with

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to apply for a fresh education loan with a new co-applicant having an acceptable credit score; bank directed to consider it expeditiously.

Nida Ahmed Ali Sayyad Vs the Union of India through… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

17-wp-6140-2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6140 OF 2023

¶4

NIDA AHMED ALI SAYYAD

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND
OTHERS

¶7

Mr. A. A. Yadkikar, a/w Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocates for
Petitioner
Ms Nikita Gore, Advocate for respondent No.1
Mr S. V. Natu, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5

¶8

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

¶9

DATE: 12.06.2023.

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

1. We have heard the learned Advocates for the

¶12

respective sides.

¶13

2.The learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5
bank submits on instructions that unless the petitioner, who is a
student, tenders a co-applicant with an acceptable credit score, the

¶14

bank cannot accept the application of the Petitioner for grant of
education loan. The two co-applicants earlier tendered by the

¶15

(( 2 ))17-wp-6140-2023

¶16

Petitioner in the two independent applications, are defaulters, in as
much, as they do not have an acceptable credit score.

¶17

3.The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that she

¶18

would tender a fresh application along with a new co-applicant with
an acceptable credit score.

¶19

4.In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with
liberty. If the application is in order, the concerned bank may consider
the same expeditiously.

¶20

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]

¶21

SMS

¶22

 2 of 2

Nida Ahmed Ali Sayyad v. the Union of India through Finance Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nida Ahmed Ali Sayyad v. the Union of India through Finance Department and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Bank of Baroda Thr the Authorised Officer Vs the District Collector Ahmednagar

Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary

Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer Rahul Dashrath Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary

Ramchandra Chunnilal Asawa and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rahul Ramakant Kulkarni Vs Neeta W/O Rahul Kulkarni

Madhav Pralhad Pate Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector and Others