Petitioner sought to challenge a withdrawn order. The court held the writ petition was infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous due to withdrawal of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5871 OF 2023
Shri. Gulshan Yashwant Mhatre and Ors. .. Petitioners
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Suraj Naik a/w. Mr. Roshan Hale i/by. Mr. Raju Suryawanshi, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for State.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : JULY 21, 2023.
P.C. :
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2023.07.24 11:20:02 +0530
1/1
25-WP--5871-2023.doc Neeta Sawant
Shri. Gulshan Yashwant Mhatre and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
