Writ petition challenging dismissal of a service complaint seeking financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme was dismissed as being devoid of merit due to adverse remarks and barred by limitation.
Writ petition dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 3
23-WP-5598-2018.doc
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5598 OF 2018
Dhondiram Govind Kakade … Petitioner
vs.
Divisional Agari Joint Director and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Amol S. Suryawanshi for the Petitioner.
Mr. C. D. Mali, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 6 JANUARY, 2023
P.C. :-
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2023.01.07 16:52:19 +0530
Petitioner was given adverse remarks in his Annual ConAdential Reports during the years 1989-90 to 1993-94.
2 / 3
23-WP-5598-2018.doc
Furthermore the Petitioner was not permitted to cross efAciency bar in the year 1994 on account of the adverse remarks in his ConAdential Reports.
3 / 3
23-WP-5598-2018.doc
knowledge of rejection, the Petitioner slept over the matter throughout. He apparently retired from service on 31 May 2003. He woke out of his deep slumber only in the year 2014 and instituted Complaint (ULP) No. 133 of 2014. The complaint was grossly barred by limitation.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme despite adverse remarks in annual confidential reports.
Whether the complaint filed by the petitioner is barred by limitation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DHONDIRAM GOVIND KAKADE
DIVISIONAL AGARI JOINT DIRECTOR AND ANR
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
