The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench received the written communication from respondent no.2. Founding the petition was rendered infructuous, the court disposed of the writ petition filed by Sunita d/o Sudhakar Demapure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0712wp5510.23
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5510 OF 2023
(Sunita d/o Sudhakar Demapure vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
______________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri Yogesh Shukla, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N.R. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent
no.1.
Shri B.N. Jaipurkar, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 7, 2023
The communication dated 22/11/2023 issued by
the respondent no.2 is taken on record.
2)In view of the said communication, the petition is
rendered infructuous and disposed of as such.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
khj
Sunita d/o Sudhakar Demapure
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court