The petitioner's writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to subsequent events. No separate reasons were recorded beyond this statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
922 WRIT PETITION NO.5456 OF 2023
DNYANESHWAR KADU BHOI THROUGH HIS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SANDIP DNYANESHWAR BHOI
VERSUS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF VARANGAON
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Deshmukh Hemantrao Panditrao
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 01st DECEMBER, 2023
PER COURT :
due to subsequent events the petition has become infructuous.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ]
Thakur-Chauhan/-
DNYANESHWAR KADU BHOI THROUGH HIS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY OF SANDIP DNYANESHWAR BHOI
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF VARANGAON
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
