Petitioner filed a writ petition against the State and the Secretary Co-operation Department. The Court dismissed the petition without examining merits, directing a personal hearing before the Co-operative Societies department before passing any order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.wp.5116.2022.doc
Rajeshri Aher
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5116 OF 2022
Pathan Parvez Khan Sultan Khan…Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra Thr. The Secretary
Co-operation Dept. and Ors.…Respondents
Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/b Vaishnavi Gujarathi, Advocate for Petitioner.
Ms. K.N. Solunke, AGP for State/Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
Mr. Patik Rahade i/b Pramod Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
CORAM:K. R. SHRIRAM &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATED:20th April 2023
P.C.:
1Mr. Rahade for Respondent No.5, at the outset, states that
Petitioner is a habitual complainant and this Petition is another attempt
to harass Respondent No.5. Mr. Pilankar for Petitioner disagrees with
Mr. Rahade and states that there is even a report annexed to the Petition
issued by Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chandwad, who is
Respondent No.4 making certain damaging observations against
Respondent No.5.
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRIPRAKASH PRAKASHAHER AHER Date: 2023.04.24 19:14:43 +0530
2Ms. Solunke for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 states that the
representation dated 23rd October 2021 and 12th January 2022 that
Petitioner has filed before Respondent No.4 will be disposed by 30th
June, 2023.
1/2
11.wp.5116.2022.doc
3Petitioner as well as Respondent No.5 shall be given a
personal hearing before Respondent No.4 passes any order. Notice of
Personal hearing shall be communicated at least five working days in
advance.
4 Petition disposed.5 We have not made any observations on the merits of thematter.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
2/2
Pathan Parvez Khan Sultan Khan
State of Maharashtra
The Secretary Co-operation Dept.
Ors.
K. R. SHRIRAM
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court