Disposed

Sahil S/O Pravin Dharmik v. the S. T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Member-Secretary, Yavatmal and Others

Bombay HC17 Aug 2023WP/5104/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding the delayed decision on a Scheduled Tribe caste certificate claim, the Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner's claim within six months upon cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.1 to decide the petitioner's claim of belonging to the Scheduled Tribe within six months.

Sahil S/O Pravin Dharmik Vs the S. T. Caste… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

wp5104.2023

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5104/2023

¶5

Sahil S/o Pravin Dharmik, aged about 18 Yrs., Occ. Student, R/o at Post Kurali, Tq. Umarkhed, Dist. Yavatmal. ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus -

¶7

The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, through its Member Secretary, Yavatmal.

¶8

Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Futala Lake Road, Nagpur 440 001.

¶9

State Common Entrance Test Cell State CET Cell, the Commissioner, 8^th Floor, New Excelsior Building, A.K. Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai 400 001. (M.S.) ... Respondents

¶10

Mr. Ashwin Deshpande, Counsel for the Petitioner. Mr. Amit A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1. Mr. N.A. Gaikwad, Counsel for Respondent No.3.

¶11

CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR & MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 17.8.2023

¶12

2 wp5104.2023

¶13

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per A.S. Chandurkar, J.)

¶14

Considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner for expeditious adjudication of his pending tribe claim the writ petition is taken up for final hearing.

¶15

Heard. Rule . Rule made returnable forthwith. Ms. S.S. Jachak, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice for respondent No.1. Mr. N.A. Gaikwad, learned counsel waives notice for respondent No.3. Service on respondent No.2 is dispensed with considering the nature of directions proposed to be issued.

¶16

The learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions submits that within a period of six months the petitioner’s claim would be decided. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.1 Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s claim of belonging to Halbi

¶17

3 wp5104.2023

¶18

Scheduled Tribe within a period of six months subject to petitioner’s cooperating with Scrutiny Committee. With these directions the writ petition is disposed of. Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶19

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶20

Tambaskar. Signed By:NEELESH VILASRAO TAMBASKAR Private Secretary Date:17.08.2023 18:29

Sahil S/O Pravin Dharmik v. the S. T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Member-Secretary, Yavatmal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahil S/O Pravin Dharmik v. the S. T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Its Member-Secretary, Yavatmal and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Dipali Dushant Chaukhe Vs the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Member Secretary

Meghan S/O Jayant Patwardhan Vs State Bank of India, Thr. Its Regional Manager, Nagpur and Another

Dr. Anand S/O Bhalchandra Barate and Others Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Mumbai and Ors.

Ramu Mohanlal Chute Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Finance, Mumbai and Others

Madani Multipurpose Education and Social Welfare Society, Tunki Bk., Thr. Secretary and Ors. Vs Deputy Director of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati

Dr. Rajendra Ramchandra Chaudhari Vs Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Mumbai through Secretary and Another