The court disposed of the writ petition as a communication placed on record informed the police not to charge-sheet the petitioner, rendering the petition unnecessary.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 510 OF 2022
Kaniz Fatima Manzar Syed .Petitioner
Vs.
ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME
Digitally signed by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2023.07.14 17:59:23 +0530
The State of Maharashtra
.Respondent
Ms Sana Khan i/b. Mr. Aditya Parmar, Advocate, for the Petitioner Ms M. H. Mhatre, APP, for the Respondent – State
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 13TH JULY, 2023
P. C.
. The Senior Police Inspector, Sir J. J. Marg Police
Thane, Mumbai has placed on record a communication dated 13.07.2023, whereby intimating that the Petitioner shall not
be charge-sheeted. The said communication is taken on
record and marked as ‘X’ for identifcation.
disposed of.
(R. N. LADDHA, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Kaniz Fatima Manzar Syed
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
