The High Court quashed the prosecution application under Section 439(2) CrPC cancelling pre-arrest bail. The court revived the bail order and directed the petitioner to comply with conditions, allowing the writ petition to be disposed of.
Impugned order cancelling bail quashed; bail order revived; petitioner directed to comply with conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-wp501-2023.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.501 OF 2023
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2023.07.1818:54:24 +0530
Manoj Baliram Dhumal … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Jyotiram S. Yadav for the applicant.
Mr. Pandurang H. Gaikwad, APP for the respondent/State.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JULY 18, 2023
P.C.:
“a) He shall attend the concerned police station on each Saturday in between 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m., till filing charge-sheet.
e) He shall refund the amount i.e. Rs.4,55,000/- to the informant within 15 days from the date of this order.”
1
906-wp501-2023.doc
petitioner on 24th April 2023 produced on record receipts to show compliance of condition No.(e) of order dated 4th April 2022.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order cancelling pre-arrest bail should be quashed given the petitioner's compliance and cooperation.
Whether the bail order passed by the Sessions Court should be revived following the quashing of the cancellation order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vaibhav Ramesh Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
