The petitioner sought a writ mandamus directing the respondent to decide and grant his pension proposal dated 08.08.2022. The court disposed of the petition as the proposal had already been forwarded, urging authorities to clear it promptly without delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp498.23
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 WRIT PETITION NO.498 OF 2023
BABAN DAJIBA ZOTE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dambe Santosh S. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. V. M.Kagne Advocate for Respondents 3 and 4 : Mr. M.C. Ghode
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 19th JANUARY, 2023.
PER COURT :-
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.)
rlj/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BABAN DAJIBA ZOTE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
