This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-NAG:14987-DB
61-WP-4898-2023.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.4898 OF 2023
Union Bank of India, through its Authorized Officer and Constituted AttorneyShri Shivnath Tripathy
vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through Collector, Nagpur and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order
Shri S.D.Ingole, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri N. R. Rode, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents.
CORAM :- A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE :- 11th OCTOBER, 2023
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of filing the writ petition has been served.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.)
Andurkar.
Union Bank of India
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Chandurkar
Mrs. Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
