The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition unconditionally, which the court granted, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 wp 4846-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4846 OF 2023
Digitally signed by LAXMI LAXMI SUBHASH SUBHASH SONTAKKE SONTAKKE Date: 2023.12.19 10:51:37 +0530
Sanjay K. Govari .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Amarnath Boddul i/b. Suhas Deokar for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w R. S. Pawar, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5.
Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni a/w Akshay Kulkarni for Respondent No.2.
Mr. S. V. Gavand for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2023
P. C.
not inclined to entertain the same, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner sought leave to unconditionally withdraw the above Writ Petition.
Page 1 of 2 DECEMBER 18 2023
Laxmi
18 wp 4846-23.doc
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.]
[ B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]
Page 2 of 2 DECEMBER 18 2023
Laxmi
Sanjay K. Govari
The State of Maharashtra and Others
B. P. Colabawalla
Somasekhar Sundaresan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
