The petitioner sought withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 458 of 2023. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with consequential relief.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:30658
09-WP-458-2023.doc
Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.458 OF 2023
Shri. Sushil Harshad Magodia …Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Vaijayanti R. Kalekar, for the Petitioner. Mr. M. G. Patil, APP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Gopal Tripathi i/b Veracious Legal, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : OCTOBER 13, 2023
P.C.:
1. Ms. Kalekar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner after arguing for some time seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1
Shri. Sushil Harshad Magodia
State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
