The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 4389 of 2018 as infructuous. The court held that a Report under Section 202 of the Cr. P.C. had already been filed in 2021 by the Judicial Magistrate at Sangli, leaving no cause of action to survive in the petition.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 902 wp 4389.18.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 4389 of 2018
Mr Mahesh Govind Patil & anr. ... Petitioners v/s. … Prakash Shivaji Chavan & anr. Respondents
None for the petitioners.
Ms Vijeta Ghorpade, advocate a/w. Abhijeet Merute i/b. Mr Brahma Deo Tripathi, advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr M.G. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM : R.N.LADDHA, J.
DATE : 14 December 2023
P.C. :
None appears for the petitioners. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that Report under Section 202 of the Cr. P.C. has already been filed in 2021 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sangli and, therefore, nothing survives in this petition.
R.N. LADDHA, J.
Lata Panjwani, P.S.
Signed by: Lata Panjwani Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/12/2023 18:55:38
Mr Mahesh Govind Patil & anr.
Prakash Shivaji Chavan & anr.
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
