Disposed

Sharad Bhaskarrao Wardekar v. Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola and Other

Bombay HC9 Jan 2023WP/4243/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suo moto or cited writ petitions concerning verification of Scheduled Tribe caste claims were disposed of. The Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the pending claims within nine months and ordered the petitioners to appear on a specified date, even though they had superannuated.

What did the court decide?

Directed Scrutiny Committee to decide caste claims within nine months; ordered petitioners to appear on 24/1/2023.

Sharad Bhaskarrao Wardekar Vs Divisional Controller… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

wp2965.19 & 4243,19

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

(I)WRIT PETITION NO.2965 OF 2019

¶5

Gajanan s/o Sahebrao Gathe,
aged : 57 years, occupation :
Bus Conductor, r/o Khetan Nagar,
Kaulkheda, Tahsil and District Akola.

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

- Versus -

¶8

1) Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Division Office, at Kaulkhed, Tahsil and District Akola.

¶9

2)The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Amravati
Division, Amravati, through its
Deputy Director and Member
Secretary, Ervin Square, at
Amravati, District Amravati. ...Respondents

¶10

Shri C.V. Jagdale, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri P.S. Gawai, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Smt. S.S. Jachak, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.2.

¶11

(II) WRIT PETITION NO.4243 OF 2019

¶12

Sharad Bhaskarrao Wardekar,
aged about 57 years, occupation :
Service, r/o Bhartipura,
Karanja (Lad), Taluq Karanja (Lad),
District Washim. ...Petitioner

¶13

2 wp2965.19 & 4243,19

¶14

- Versus -

¶15

1) Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola.

¶16

2) Manager, Karanja Depot of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Karanja (Lad), District Washim.

¶17

3) Deputy Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati. ... Respondents

¶18

Shri R.S. Kurekar, Advocate for petitioner.

¶19

Shri P.S. Gawai, Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2.

¶20

Smt. S.S. Jachak, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.3.

¶21

 CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR AND
 MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
 DATED : JANUARY 9, 2023

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.):

¶23

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

¶24

with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶25

2)The petitioners are in the employment with the
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation. During the course of
employment, their caste claims were referred to the Scrutiny

¶26

3 wp2965.19 & 4243,19

¶27

Committee for verification. Since their caste claims were pending
and there was a threat to their continuation in employment, they had
approached this Court by filing these writ petitions. During
pendency of the writ petitions, both the petitioners have
superannuated.

¶28

3)In these facts, interest of justice would be served by
directing the Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claims of the
petitioners within a period of nine months from the date of
petitioners’ appearance before the Scrutiny Committee. Both the
petitioners shall appear before the Scrutiny Committee at Amravati
on 24/1/2023. With these directions, the writ petitions are disposed
of. Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶29

 JUDGE

¶30

 JUDGE

¶31

khj

¶32

Digitally Signed By:KAMAL HUNDRAJ JESWANI Signing Date:10.01.2023 18:37

Sharad Bhaskarrao Wardekar v. Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharad Bhaskarrao Wardekar v. Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnagopal S/O Baijnath Gupta Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Ex-Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Nitesh Shriram Sonwane Vs the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Thr. Its Member Secretary and Others

Savita Fulsing Darkor Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secy. Tribal Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Jayprakash Sahadeorao Manohar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development and Revenue Department, Mumbai

Gajanan S/O Shebrao Gathe Vs Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola and Another

Miss. Juvena John Bhise Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai