The petitioner, aggrieved by delay, sought a direction to the Trial Court at Nashik to decide a suit filed in 2004 within six months. The learned Judge disposed of the writ petition directing the trial court accordingly.
Directed the Civil Court at Nashik to decide the suit within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-wp4137-2022.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4137 OF 2022
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAVRAMESH JADHAV Date: 2023.08.2118:50:03 +0530
Ashok Devkisan Bhutda … Petitioner V/s. Yuvraj Vasant Salve & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Gautam S. Hiranandani for the petitioner.
Ms. Anjali Binjola i/by Mr. Sanjay Shinde for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 21, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Ashok Devkisan Bhutda
Yuvraj Vasant Salve
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
