Disposed

M/S. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate Developers Llp, through Its Partner v. Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Jul 2023WP/4120/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Both writ petitions and an associated contempt petition were disposed of on the parties' joint ground that they had amicably resolved the dispute through executed consent terms. The court recorded the settlement and accepted the undertaking.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions and contempt petition stood disposed; consent terms recorded on record.

M/S. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate Developers… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

5-wp-4120-2018.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.4120 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.10212 OF 2018 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.289 OF 2019

¶4

M/s. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate ...Petitioner

¶5

vs.

¶6

Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal and Others ...Respondents

¶7

Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b. Ms. Shruti Tulpule, for the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Sanjiv Sawant a/w. Ms. Bhakti Wast i/b. Mr. Abhishek Deshmukh, for Respondent No. 1.

¶9

Mr. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the State.

¶10

Mr. Anish Shah, the partner of petitioner present.

¶11

Mr. Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal, Respondent No. 1 present.

¶12

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : JULY 24, 2023

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

The learned counsel for the parties make a joint statement

¶16

that the petitioner and respondent No. 1 have amicably resolved the

¶17

dispute and the consent terms have been executed. The learned counsel seeks leave to tender the consent terms.

¶18

Mr. Anish Shah, one of the designated partners of the petitioner, and Mr. Radhavallabh Kejriwal, the respondent No. 1 are

¶19

present before the Court. They admit the contents of the consent terms and execution thereof.

Vishal Parekar

...1

5-wp-4120-2018.doc

Mr. Radhavallabh Kejriwal, upon being inquired submits that he has received a Pay Order in the sum of Rs. 50 lakhs and admits the contents of the consent terms. The consent terms are signed by the respective parties and their counsels.

¶24

It seems that the parties have worked out a comprehensive settlement of the dispute. Thus the consent terms are taken on record and marked “X”.

¶25

Both the petitions stand disposed in accordance with the consent terms (X).

¶26

The undertaking given in the consent terms (X) are accepted as the undertaking to the Court.

¶27

By way of abundant caution, it is clarified that the consent terms will not bind the persons who are not the parties to these consent terms.

¶28

In view of the disposal of the petitions, the Contempt Petition

¶29

No. 289 of 2019 also stands disposed.

¶30

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)

¶31

Vishal Parekar

¶32

...2

M/S. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate Developers Llp, through Its Partner v. Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate Developers Llp, through Its Partner v. Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mithelish Gupta vs the Custodian

Seema Maheshwari vs the Custodian and Others

T. Jayachandran and Anr. vs the Custodian

United Ocean Ship Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and 2 Ors.

M/S. Shubham Dynamic Real Estate Developers Llp, through Its Partner Vs Radhavallabh C. Kejriwal and Ors.

Shri. Savlaram Narayan Namade Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.