Allowed

Smt. Ujjawala Wd/O. Suresh Durge and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development, Mumbai and Another

Bombay HC7 Sept 2023WP/3888/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a writ petition by a widow of an untrained Primary Teacher seeking pensionary benefits under the Seventh Pay Commission, ruling that she is entitled to the same benefits as established in a previously decided petition involving a similarly situated petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed in terms of the prayer clause (A) based on previous similar precedence, with necessary compliance to be done within three months.

Smt. Ujjawala Wd/O. Suresh Durge and Another… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 WP-3888-2023.odt

¶2

2023:BHC-NAG:13328-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.3888 of 2023

¶5

Smt. Ujjawala wd/o Suresh Durge and another

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Maharashtra and another

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
Shri P.N. Shende, Counsel for Petitioners.
Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.
Shri A.W. Paunikar, Counsel for Respondent No.2.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER,2023 .

¶11

P. C. :

¶12

1.Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned counsel
appearing for the parties.

¶13

2.The husband of the petitioner No.1 was serving as untrained Primary
Teacher in the School run by the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. The petitioner No.1-
his widow seeks pensionary benefits in terms of the recommendations of the
Seventh Pay Commission. The learned counsel for the parties do not dispute
that the similar issue has been considered and decided by the Division Bench in
Writ Petition No.2035 of 2022 [Smt. Anjali Wd/o Madhukar Kando and another
Versus State of Maharashtra and another] on 3-4-2023. Since the petitioners
are similarly situated, the present writ petition is allowed for the reasons
assigned in the decision referred to above in terms of the prayer clause (A). The
necessary compliance be done within a period of three months from receiving
the copy of this order.

¶14

3. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

¶15

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)

¶16

LANJEWAR

Smt. Ujjawala Wd/O. Suresh Durge and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development, Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Ujjawala Wd/O. Suresh Durge and Another v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development, Mumbai and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Saibaba Shikshan Sanstha Thr. Secretary, Amravati and Others Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Shri Saibaba Shikshan Sanstha Thr. Secretary Amravati and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Philomina D/O Joseph Pichappilly Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secy., Urban Devp. and 3 Ors.

M/S Komal Stone Crusher, Yavatmal through Proprietor Shri Pawan S/O Nandlalji Panpaliya Vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Department of Industry, Energy and Labour, Mumbai and Others

Manish S/O Amol Pusadekar, Since Minor Thr. Natural Guardian Father, Amol S/O Wasudeorao Pusadekar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Tribal Welfare and Social Justice, Mumbai and Anr.

Smt. Lata Wd/O. Arun Nandanwar Vs Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli Thr. Chief Executive Officer and Another