The High Court Civil Appellate Bench dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the underlying matter had already been challenged via a civil revision application.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/2
42 - WP 3750 OF 2022.doc
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2023.08.0814:13:45 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3750 OF 2022
Satish Sharma
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
Khemchand Khushaldas Rajpal Vaswani & Ors.
….. Respondents
Mr.A.S. Khandeparkar for the Petitioner.
Mr.V.C.Ghosalkar for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2023
P.C:-
When the matter is called out, Mr. Khandeparkar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order pursuant to which the execution was allowed was challenged before the Appellate Bench and this challenge has been dismissed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court on 6th May, 2023 against which Civil Revision Application being (Stamp) No. 15754 of 2023 has already been filed in this Court and therefore nothing survives in this petition. He therefore submits that this petition be disposed as infructuous.
KVM
2/2
42 - WP 3750 OF 2022.doc
confirms the same.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
Satish Sharma
Khemchand Khushaldas Rajpal Vaswani & Ors.
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
