Two writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of. The single-judge bench held there was no further need to hear the petitions.
Disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
45wp1804-22+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1804 OF 2022
Sopan Shankar Marathe and Ors. … Petitioners Versus Late Mr.Balu Sahadu Marathe (Deceased), through LRs and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2022
Dattatray Balu Marathe and Ors. … Petitioners Versus Sopan Shankar Marathe and Ors. … Respondents
— —
Mr. Sagar Bhirange for petitioners in WP/1804/2022 and for the respondents in WP/3654/2022
Mr.Jaydeep S. Deo for the petitioners in WP/3654/2022 and for the Respondents in WP/1804/2022.
— —
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : August 2, 2023.
P. C. :
that the petitions have become infructuous, as the suit itself has been disposed of.
Digitally signed by SANJAY SANJAYASARAM ASARAMMANDAWGAD MANDAWGAD Date: 2023.08.02 16:27:35 +0530
sanjay_mandawgad
Sopan Shankar Marathe
Late Mr. Balu Sahadu Marathe (Deceased) through LRs
Dattatray Balu Marathe
Sopan Shankar Marathe
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
