This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-WP 358-22.DOC
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 358 OF 2022
PAN CONSTRUCTION THR. ITS PARTNER
AND POA RAMESH LOTLIKAR
… Petitioner
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND 3 ORS…Respondents
Mr. Shane Gomes Pereira, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Ms. Maria Correia,
Additional Government Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES,JJ DATED : 13th MARCH 2023
P.C.:
1. Mr. Pereira, learned counsel for the Petitioner based on the instructions from the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file a representation to the Respondents for the return of EMD. He states that such representation would be made within two weeks from today. If such representation is made, the concerned authorities to consider and dispose of the same in accord with law and within two months from the receipt of the same. Accordingly, leave is granted with liberty as prayed for.
2. The petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J M. S. SONAK, J
Page 1 of 1 13th March 2023
TARI AMRUT NAGESH Digitally signed by TARI AMRUT NAGESH Date: 2023.03.14 10:09:24 +05'30'
PAN CONSTRUCTION
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
M. S. SONAK
VALMIKI SA MENEZES
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court