In WP No. 3235 of 2022, the High Court directed the competent authority to decide the pending representation for pension grants expeditiously within three months on merits and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to decide the pending representation for pension grant within three months; disposal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39 wp3235-22.docx
TRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Digitally signed byTRUSHA TUSHAR MOHITE Date: 2023.03.14 15:37:44 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2022
Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve
….. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr.Shailesh K. More for the Petitioner Mr.Milind V. More, Addl. G.P. for the State
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : MARCH 13, 2023
P.C.
permanency. The said judgment was upheld by this court. Pensionary benefits are not paid to the Petitioner. The learned counsel submits that the Petitioner has given representation. The same is not yet decided.
(page 57) is pending with Respondent no.3 and if Respondent no.3 is competent authority, the same shall be decided expeditiously,
1/2
Mohite
39 wp3235-22.docx
preferably within three months on its own merits.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Mohite
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the pending representation for grant of pension held by Respondent No. 3 must be decided expeditiously.
Whether the concerned authority is competent to decide the representation.
Sangeeta Bhimnath Surve
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
