This judgment dismisses a Writ Petition challenging an order of the Additional Commissioner. The High Court held that since the petition does not seek a writ against the Revenue Minister to dispose of the pending Second Revision Application, no direction to do so is issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURUDate: RAJGURU 2023.03.1612:34:08 +0530
903-wp-3064-2023.doc
1 / 2
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3064 of 2023
Riyaz Rasul Mulla … Petitioner
vs.
Shivsagar Ramnath Kesarwani and Ors … Respondents
Mr. Ajit M. Savagave, for the Petitioner
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, B- Panel Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.
CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA AND GAURI GODSE, JJ.
DATED : 10 MARCH, 2023
P.C. :-
2 / 2
903-wp-3064-2023.doc
the Revenue Minister, Writ Petition is filed.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
(R. D. DHANUKA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging an order dismissing a Second Revision Application should be dismissed when there is no prayer for mandamus against the Revenue Minister.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Riyaz Rasul Mulla
Shivsagar Ramnath Kesarwani and Ors
R. D. DHANUKA
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
