Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to approach appropriate remedies.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
935 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.300 OF 2023
DE. DEEPAK VASANTRAO KESARI VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA STATE HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMISSION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Deshpande Shreyas S.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 24 MARCH 2023
PC :
Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the writ petition.
avail of appropriate remedy as is available to him in law.
[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
arp/
De. Deepak Vasantryao Kesari
The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission, Mumbai
Mangesh S. Patil
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
