Disposed

Chetansingh S/O Kalyansing Rajput v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Additional Chief Secretary Finance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Dec 2023WP/2998/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner (GST), sought directions for non-decision on a complaint regarding a senior officer's default. The bench directed the Commissioner State Tax (GST) to decide the representation within twelve weeks. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Commissioner State Tax (GST) to decide the petitioner's representation within twelve weeks and communicate the decision.

Chetansingh S/O Kalyansing Rajput Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 wp2998.23

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 2998 OF 2023

¶4

( Dr. Chetansing s/o Kalyansing Rajput ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, through its Additional Chief Secretary, Mumbai and others )

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Mr. Ashwin Deshpande, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.S. Fulzele, Addl.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶8

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &

¶9

ABHAY J. MANTRI, J J . DATED : 07-12-2023

¶10

Heard.

¶11

The petitioner is Class 1 officer working as Assistant Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax approached the respondents vide complaint dated 29-7-2022 alleging serious default by respondent No.5his senior officer. The aforesaid complaint dated 29-7-2022 is informed to him not decided or at least any decision taken has not been communicated to him. As such through this petition the prayer is for issuance of appropriate directions.

¶12

The Additional Government Pleader Mr. A.S. Fulezele would seek time as the respondents have neither issued instructions nor requested the office of the Government Pleader to seek time in the matter. The aforesaid approach on the part of the respondent authorities is appears to be callous.

¶13

2 wp2998.23

¶14

Be that as it may, having regard to the claim put forth by the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to direct the Commissioner State Tax (GST) to decide the representation of the petitioner having regard to the pleadings made in the present petition which was addressed to the said authority dated 29-7-2022. Let the representation be decided within a period of twelve weeks and the decision taken be communicated to the petitioner.

¶15

5. The petition is disposed of.

¶16

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶17

adgokar

Chetansingh S/O Kalyansing Rajput v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Additional Chief Secretary Finance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetansingh S/O Kalyansing Rajput v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Additional Chief Secretary Finance Department, Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh S/O. Bisan Sahare and Others Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Home, Affairs, New Delhi and Others

Bhaulal S/O Dhanlal Parteti and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Others

Smt. Sharda Arjuna Mankar @ Sau. Sharda Tulshiram Godghase Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Tribal Welfare Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Namdeo Yadavrao Dondarkar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Another

Snehal D/O Hemraj Neware Vs State of Maharashtra, (Trti), Thr. Project Officer and Commissioner, Pune and Another

Sagar Sakharam Walale Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary for Medical Education and Drugs Dept., Mumbai and Others