The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order explicitly stated that all contentions in the pending arbitration remain unaffected by the withdrawal of the writ petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-OSWP-2929-2018.DOC
Amol
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2929 OF 2018
NCUBE Planning And Design Pvt Ltd …Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr …Respondents
Mr Ambar Qamaruddin , with Sanjana Muttath i/b Rex Legalis, for the Petitioner.
Mr Amit Patil , i/b Parinam Law Associates, for Respondent No. 2. Mr Kedar Dighe , AGP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 9th February 2023
PC:-
1. The dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 in in arbitration.
AMOL
PREMNATH JADHAV
Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2023.02.10 10:55:05 +0530
2. All contentions in arbitration are obviously kept open and will remain unaffected by any order in this Writ Petition, the filing of any Affidavit in this Writ Petition or the present order allowing withdrawal of the Petition.
3. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(Neela Gokhale, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 9th February 2023
NCUBE Planning And Design Pvt Ltd
State of Maharashtra
G.S. Patel
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
