Disposed

Milind Madhukarrao Labade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Gram Dev. Dept. Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC4 May 2023WP/2914/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition challenging an order of transfer. The court directed the Zilla Parishad, Amravati, to reconsider the transfer order in light of the petitioner's representation regarding his age and paralytic condition, staying the transfer during the reconsideration period.

What did the court decide?

Directed Zilla Parishad, Amravati, Chief Executive Officer to consider petitioner's representations and take a decision within ten days; stay of transfer order during pendency.

Milind Madhukarrao Labade Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 WP-2914-2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

Writ Petition No.2914 of 2023

¶4

Milind Madhukarrao Labade

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Maharashtra and others

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Shri P.S. Patil, Counsel for Petitioner.
Shri A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.
Shri Saket Makkad, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.

¶10

DATE : 4th MAY, 2023 .

¶11

1. Considering the short issue involved, the matter is heard finally.

¶12

2.The petitioner is faced with the order of transfer dated 21-3-2023.
In terms of the Government Resolution dated 7-4-2021, the petitioner has made
a representation dated 10-4-2023 pointing out that he would attain the age of
57 years on 25-5-2023 and would be superannuating within one year.
The petitioner is also a paralytic patient and hence he seeks reconsideration of
the order of transfer. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
addition to the aforesaid representation, the petitioner would file an additional
representation within a period of four days from today.

¶13

3.In view of aforesaid, the respondent No.2- Zilla Parishad, Amravati,
through its Chief Executive Officer is directed to consider the petitioner’s
representation dated 10-4-2023 along with the additional representation and
take a decision thereon in the light of the Government Resolution
dated 7-4-2021. Such decision be taken within a period of ten days of receiving
the additional representation. Till the representation is decided, the order of
transfer shall not be effected.

¶14

4. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. No costs.

¶15

Digitally Signed By :P D LANJEWAR Signing Date:04.05.2023 17:05

¶16

 LANJEWAR

Milind Madhukarrao Labade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Gram Dev. Dept. Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Milind Madhukarrao Labade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Gram Dev. Dept. Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Gorgeous Apparels, Delhi Thr. Proprietor, Vijay Mohan Vs Union of India Ministry of Finance Thr. Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Vinod Narayan Thengare Vs State of Maha., Thr. the District Collector, State Excise Department, Chandrapur and Another

Ravikant Baburao Upganlawar Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the District Collector, State Excise Dept., Chandrapur and Anr.

Sambha Soma Kulsange and Others Vs State of Maha., Presented Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Road Project Division and Ors.

Vitthal Latari Satpute and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Presented Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Yavatmal and Others

Mahadeo Deorao Chahankar and Others Vs State of Maha., Presented Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition, Road Project Division, Yavatmal and Ors.