High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a convicted petitioner seeking premature release. The Court held that as the earlier appeal challenging conviction was dismissed, no ground for interference existed under the policy concerning premature release claim.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
14.WP.28.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 28 OF 2020
Dnyaneshwar Rajaram Dhephe ....PETITIONER V/S The State Of Maharashtra & Ors ....RESPONDENTS
Mr. Prashant Badole for the Petitioner Ms M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State-Respondent
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ
DATED : 23rd JUNE, 2023
P.C.:
1/2
akn
2/2
14.WP.28.2020.doc
the Petitioner is already dismissed by this Court. That being so, no
case for interference is made out.
(R. N. LADDHA, J)
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
2/2
akn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in a petition by a convicted petitioner seeking premature release where the appeal has already been dismissed.
Dnyaneshwar Rajaram Dhephe
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
