The high court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance. Subsequently, upon instructions, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13 WP-2705-2013.doc
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2705 OF 2013
HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI
Vijaylaxmi Shriramkrishna Gandi & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
Subhash Hemraj Hiran …Respondent
Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2023.08.09 10:49:41 +0530
Mr. Amol Wagh i/b Mr. Sagar Kasar for the Petitioners.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : AUGUST 7, 2023
P. C. :
1. On 1st August, 2023 none appears for the Petitioners and learned
counsel appearing for the Respondent has pointed out the previous orders whereby various opportunities were given to the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners to argue the matter. Today also non appears for the Petitioners. The Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )
Later on :
The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
1
HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI
Subhash Hemraj Hiran
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
