Petitioners challenged an interim order from a disposed suit. Court held the petition infructuous as the original suit was disposed of in 2010 and adjudication was complete. Disposed with no costs.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-wp2469-2009.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2469 OF 2009
VAIBHAV
RAMESH
JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2023.11.09 11:18:51 +0530
Tulshiram Shankar More & Anr. … Petitioners V/s.
Vitthal Sahebrao Mokashi & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sagar A. Joshi for the petitioners.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : NOVEMBER 8, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in view of the prior disposal of the underlying suit.
Tulshiram Shankar More & Anr.
Vitthal Sahebrao Mokashi & Ors.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
