Disposed

Nandkumar Vasant Vidhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC3 Jul 2023WP/2439/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner's RTS appeal regarding a 7/12 extract update from 1968 is pending with the Tahsildar. The Court dismissed merits due to limitation. It directed the Respondent to serve notices and decide the appeal within 120 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.3 to issue notices within 21 days and decide the pending RTS appeal within 120 days.

Nandkumar Vasant Vidhate Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

13 WRIT PETITION NO.2439 OF 2023

¶4

NANDKUMAR VASANT VIDHATE
VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶6

Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.S.G.Karlekar, AGP for the Respondent/State.

¶7

( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
 Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.)

¶8

DATE : JULY 3, 2023

¶9

PER COURT:

¶10

1.The grievance of the Petitioner is that his RTS Appeal filed
some time in 2021 (no date is mentioned on the appeal), lodged on
30.11.2021 before Respondent No.3 / Tahsildar, is pending
adjudication.

¶11

2.The learned AGP points out from the prayers made in the
RTS appeal that a 7/12 extract of 1932 which subsequently underwent
a change in 1968, is sought to be set aside, and the case is hopelessly
barred by limitation.

¶12

khs/July 2023/2439

¶13

3. Considering the above, we are not going into the merits of
the matter. This Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent
No.3 to issue notices to all the litigating parties within 21 days from
today and thereafter decide the pending RTS appeal within 120 days
from the returnable date in the matter. Needless to state, all
contentions of the litigating parties including the issue of delay and
laches, are kept open.

¶14

 ( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶15

khs/July 2023/2439

Nandkumar Vasant Vidhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandkumar Vasant Vidhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. through Its Managing Director Babulal Gurjar Vs Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Another

Digvijaysing Ganeshsing Bayas Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Industry and Others

Sandipan Pralhad Alias Babarao Bade through General Power of Attorney Holder Uddhav Babarao Bade Vs the Union of India through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Laxmibai Balnath Zinjurde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Superintendent of Police Rural and Others

M/S New Top Industrial Protection Security Group through Its Proprietor Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Another

Math Prakashnath Buwa Alias Garibnath Buwa through Its Sole Trustee Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others