Dismissed

Nila Vinod Pandya and 2 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC23 Mar 2023WP/2438/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Bombay, disposed of Writ Petition No.2438 of 2016 as withdrawn following parties' consent. Prior to withdrawal, the court permitted an amendment to the cause title due to the death of a petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw petition based on consent terms; amendment permitted for deletion of deceased petitioner's name.

Nila Vinod Pandya and 2 Ors. Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 901-wp-2438-2016.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.2438 OF 2016

¶4

Nila Vinod Pandya & Ors. … Petitioners

¶5

V/s.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Jas Snghavi a/w. Mr. Prakash Shah and Mr. Viraj Y. Bhate i/by PDS Legal for the Petitioners.

¶8

Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, AGP for the State-Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶9

Ms. Dipti Gandhi a/w. Mr. Jash Gandhi a/w Mr. Jash Gandhi for Respondent No.3.

¶10

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶11

DATE : 23RD MARCH 2023

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners points out that, the Petitioner No.2

¶14

has passed away on 16th February 2023. He, therefore, seeks to amend the

¶15

cause title by deleting the name of the petitioner No.2. Liberty as prayed for is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶16

He tendered the draft amendment of the legal heirs of the Petitioner

¶17

No.2. The draft amendment is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.

¶18

S A Pathan

¶19

1 of 2

¶20

2 901-wp-2438-2016.doc

¶21

Amendment is permitted to carry out in terms of the draft amendment forthwith.

¶22

Learned Counsel for the parties tendered consent terms entered between the parties, which has been signed by the constituted attorney of Petitioner Nos.1 and 3 and the Chairman Samir Vakil on behalf of Respondent No.3. The constituted attorney of Petitioner Nos.1 and 3 is present in the Court. The chairman of Respondent No.3 is also present in the Court. They have identified all the terms and condition. The terms and condition is therefore taken on record and marked ‘X-1’ for identification.

¶23

In view of the consent terms, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.

¶24

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

¶25

Re-verification is dispensed with.

¶26

Amendment shall be carried out on or before 24th March, 2023, 5:00

¶27

p.m.

¶28

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶29

S A Pathan

¶30

2 of 2

Nila Vinod Pandya and 2 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nila Vinod Pandya and 2 Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farokh Behram Daruvala Vs Hosi Hormusji Damania (Deceased)

Madhu Krishna Murthy Vs Narayan Krishna Murthy (Deceased)

Shiva Bhagwan Vankar Vs Bhagwan Shiva Vankar

Shubhangi Anant Kadam and Anr. Vs the Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board and 2 Ors.

Mount Nirmala Co-Operative Housing Society Limited vs Bishop John Rodrigues and Another

Edison Dcosta Fernandes and Anr. Vs Luella Irene Dcosta Fernandes (Deceased)