Disposed

Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation v. Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC20 Sept 2023WP/2401/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judgment, by consent, quashes the judgment of the District Judge and an eviction order of the Resident Deputy Collector. It directs the First Authority to decide the eviction application within twelve weeks following the Maharashtra Government Premises Eviction Act, 1956. The writ petition is disposed of in these terms.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of impugned judgment and eviction order; direction to decide eviction application within twelve weeks under Maharashtra Government Premises Eviction Act, 1956.

Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation Vs Baron… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1-wp-2401-2013.doc

¶2

SA Pathan

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2401 OF 2013

¶5

SHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN

¶6

Digitally signed bySHABNOOR AYUB PATHAN Date: 2023.09.21 17:47:01 +0530

¶7

Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation … Petitioner

¶8

V/s. Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd & Anr. … Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.384 OF 2018 IN

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.2401 OF 2013

¶12

Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd & Anr. … Applicants In the matter between Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation … Petitioner V/s. Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd & Anr. … Respondents

¶13

Mr. L. M. Acharrya a/w Mr. Anish Khandekar and Ms. Uroosa Shaikh, for petitioner.

¶14

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Dormaan Dalal, for respondent No.1 in Writ Petition No.2401 of 2013 & for applicant in Civil Application No.384 of 2018.

¶15

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.Darashanchandra B Zaveri, for respondent No.2 in Writ Petition No.2401 of 2013 and for applicant No.2 in Civil Application No.384 of 2018.

¶16

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 20, 2023

1-wp-2401-2013.doc

P.C.:

By the consent of the parties, following order is passed:

¶21

a) The impugned judgment and order dated 31 July 2012 passed by the District Judge, Pune in Civil Appeal No.642 of 2008 and the order dated 11 September 2008 passed by Resident Deputy Collector/ Competent Authority, Pune in Eviction Petition No.82 of 2006 are quashed and set aside.

¶22

b) All contentions of both the parties are kept expressly open to be adjudicated by the authorities below.

¶23

Considering the facts of the case, the First Authority i.e. Resident Deputy Collector and Competent Authority, Pune is directed to decide the application within twelve weeks from today.

¶24

The parties shall appear before the Resident Deputy Collector and Competent Authority, Pune on 26 September 2023 .

¶25

The First Authority shall fix schedule for arriving on decision as per the provisions of the Maharashtra Government Premises Eviction Act, 1956.

¶26

The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms.

¶27

The prayer made in Civil Application No.384 of 2018 shall be subject to final adjudication by the First Authority.

¶28

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶29

Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation v. Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation v. Baron Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Ketaki Aaditya Prabhudharwatkar (Maiden Name Ketaki Girish Telang) Vs Mr. Aaditya Suresh Prabhudharwatkar

Manoj Gursahani Vs Priya Gursahani Alias Sweetee Sai

Sumit Milap Bhansali Vs Kavita Mohan Bhandari

The New Inida Assurance Company Ltd. Vs the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai

Arunoday Ajay Singh Vs Lee Anne Elton

Gopinath Ganpat Bhondkar and Ors. Vs the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) and Ors.