Petitioner sought quashing of FIR via writ petition but withdrew it after Police filed 'C' Summary Report; High Court disposed of petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NISHA Digitally signed byNISHA SANDEEP SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2023.02.20 CHITNIS 11:30:06 +0530
15-wp.240.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.240 OF 2022
Dilip Mohanlal Gupta …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Sarita Yadav i/b Bhagwan Mishra & Associates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, A.P.P for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 – State.
PSI – Ashok Sapkal, attached to Arnala Police Station, Palghar, is present.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY 2023
P.C. :
leave to amend to mask the name of the respondent No.3/prosecutrix
and replace it with an alphabet not only in the cause title but wherever
it appears in the petition. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
bearing C.R. No. 313 of 2018 registered with the Arnala Police
1/2
N. S. Chitnis
15-wp.240.2022.doc
Station, Palghar, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Quashing is sought on the premise, that the parties have amicably settled their dispute.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
N. S. Chitnis
Dilip Mohanlal Gupta
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Revati Mohite Dere
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
