Writ Petition disposed of by consent. No view expressed on merits. Court directed subordinate authority to decide pending application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-wp-239-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 239 OF 2023
Aquarock Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondent
Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh for Petitioner.
Mr. Sukanta A. Karmakar, AGP for Respondent No. 1-State. Mrs. P. H. Kantharia, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6. Ms. Shilpa Redkar Respondent No. 7- MCGM. Mr. Chirag Balsara i/b. R. P. Ojha for Respondent Nos. 8 to 41. Mr. Ajaz Ahmed Ansari for R. No. 42.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2023
P.C. :
and 2nd December, 2022.
submits that the Respondents have also filed before AGRC an being Application/
A.B.Kakde 1/2
19-wp-239-2023.doc
Appeal No. 210 of 2021. Learned Counsel submits that tomorrow this matter is
listed on board before the AGRC. However, he requested that AGRC may be
directed to dispose of the said Application expeditiously.
Petition. Present Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of.
expeditiously. This court has not express any view on the merits of the matter.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
A.B.Kakde 2/2
Aquarock Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos. 8 to 41
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
