The court recorded consent terms filed by the applicant and respondent. The writ petition was disposed of based on the settlement agreement accepted by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43. WP 2345-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2345 OF 2022
Devraj Sanjeev Gore … Applicant
Vs.
Roshan A. Premji and Anr.… Respondents
Mr. A. J. Jaibhave for Applicant.
Mr. Rajesh Parab with Mr. Johnson John for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: ABHAY AHUJA J.
DATE : 3 JULY 2023
P.C. :
1. Learned Counsel for the parties tender across the bar the Consent
Terms dated 3rd July, 2023 signed by the parties as well as the learned Counsel, which are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purposes of identification, stating that the Writ Petition is settled in terms of the Consent Terms and the Petition be disposed of as such.2. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above
terms.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
1 of 1
Nikita Gadgil
Devraj Sanjeev Gore
Roshan A. Premji
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court