The Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune and Ors. v. M/S. M. M. Nahar
Case brief
What is this about?
Courts to reinforce that this is a thin order regarding a writ petition where the respondent had no appearance before the court. No substantive judicial pronouncements were made.
What the court decided
48.WP.2301.2009.doc
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2301 OF 2009
The Municipal Corporation of The City of Pune and Ors. …Petitioners. V/s. M/s. M.M. Nahar …Respondent
Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni a/w Shweta Shah, Advocate for Petitioners.
CORAM : RAJESH S PATIL, J.
DATED : 27th JANUARY 2023
P.C.:
1 Heard Mr. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Office remark shows
that rule issued to Respondent was served. None appeared for the Respondent, therefore, without the assistant of the Respondent the
present Writ Petition has been heard finally. Matter closed for passing judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Municipal Corporation of The City of Pune and Ors
- respondent
M/s. M.M. Nahar
Coram
RAJESH S PATIL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Chandrakant Jethabhai Patel Decd Thru Lr and Anr. Vs M/S. Wadala Udyog Bhavan Units Holders Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Mumbai
Shri. Ulhas Ankush Marne Decd Thru Lhr Shri. Nikhil Ulhas Marne Vs M/S. Aquapharm Chemical Company Limited
Mudassar Mohammad Rafique Kokni and Ors. Vs Ahmedsaheb Fakirsaheb Kokani Decd Thr Lhrs Rafique Ahmedsaheb Kokani and Ors.
Annapa Shankar Patil and Ors. Vs Sonabai Shivba Sutar and Ors.