A writ petition was disposed of as infructuous on the statement of the learned counsel that the underlying matter had been worked out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 11 wp 228-18-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.228 OF 2018
Shri Suresh Murlidhar Kalekar … Petitioner
Vs.
Shri Bastimal Nihalchand Porwal
Deceased through legal heirs and ors. … Respondents
Mr.Kunal Bhanage, Advocate for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :18 JULY, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Mr.Kunal Bhanage, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that
the underlying matter has been worked out and therefore, this petition
has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
1 of 1
Priya R. Soparkar
Shri Suresh Murlidhar Kalekar
Shri Bastimal Nihalchand Porwal
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court