04.05.2015 based on a cause of action pertaining to fraudulent entries in the revenue records as of 03.03.1993, which is the date of cause of action for the suit. Subsequent thereto, in the proceedings before the revenue authorities, there were some orders passed in respect of reversion of survey records and, accordingly, on the basis of the cause of action that arose on 09.04.2015 and 16.11.2015, which was the date of reversion in the survey record, the plaintiff filed an application for amendment based on this cause of action. It is the contention of the petitioner appearing in person that the application for amendment seeks inclusion of new two causes of action which have arisen post the filing of the suit. It is his submission that such amendment cannot be permitted. It is further submitted that the amendment is sought only for bringing the suit within limitation. It is further submitted that having noticed that the suit is completely barred by limitation, in an ingenious way, an amendment is sought incorporating two new causes of action only for the purpose of defeating the rights of the petitioners. It is further submitted that as on the date of the filing of the application for amendment, the application made by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was pending and that should have been decided first in point of time. It is thus submitted that as a result of the amendment, the entire nature of the suit is being changed. In support of his contentions, the petitioners relied upon several decisions which are as follows :
