Single judge of the Bombay High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 2138 of 2016 by admitting consent terms executed by the parties, finding no coercion, and accepting undertakings given by the parties.
Writ petition disposed in accordance with consent terms marked 'X'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:23304
3 WP 2138 OF 2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2138 OF 2016
Archana Babanrao Pawar
… Petitioner
versus
Head Master, Rambhau Mhalgi Secondary and Higher Secondary School and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Swaraj Jadhav i/by Mr. Chetan Mali, for Petitioner. Mr. P.M.Havnur with Ms. Prajakta Jagtap for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. V.S.Nimbalkar, AGP for State.
Mrs. Archana Pawar, Petitioner and Mr. Ashok Gargote, Chairman of Respondent No.2 present.
CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 17 AUGUST 2023
P.C.
and 2 have amicably resolved the dispute and the consent terms have been executed.
The learned Counsel seek leave to tender consent terms.
Chairman of Respondent No.2 are present in Court. They admit the contents of the
consent terms and the execution thereof.
perused the consent terms and is agreeable to the terms incorporated therein.
SSP 1/2
3 WP 2138 OF 2016.doc
terms and there is no coercion or duress.
Terms, ‘X’.
undertakings given to the Court.
( N.J.JAMADAR, J. )
SSP 2/2
Head Master, Rambhau Mhalgi Secondary and Higher Secondary School and Ors.
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
