Petitioner challenged an order rejecting an application to dismiss a suit or exclude suit properties. The court found no error apparent on the face of the record and dismissed the writ petition.
The civil writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-wp2132-2023.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2132 OF 2023
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2023.08.2816:53:39 +0530
Shantaram Gangaram Patil … Petitioner V/s. Alka Makrand Aswale & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Manoj A. Patil for the petitioner.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : AUGUST 28, 2023
P.C.:
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order by the Trial Court rejecting the petitioner's application for dismissal of the suit or exclusion of properties requires interference in writ proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Alka Makrand Aswale & Ors.
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
