The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution after the appointed advocate reported lack of instructions from the petitioners.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
222.wp.2018.01.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2018 OF 2001
Shantabai Shamrao Pawar and Anr. .. Petitioners
Versus
Sindhubai Ranuji Kunjir and Ors...Respondents
Mr. H. D. Gole, Advocate for PetitionersMrs. V.S.Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent – StateCORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:FEBRUARY 02, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Gole, learned Advocate for Petitioners.
2. This matter was on board for final hearing on 01.12.2022,
15.12.2022 and 19.01.2023 and Advocate on record Mr. H. D. Gole
appearing for the Petitioners has expired long back. Mr. Pradeep Gole
appearing today states that he has sent a letter to the Petitioners and
has not received any communication from them. He informs that
Petitioners have not contacted him despite receiving his notice and he
has no instructions whatsoever.
3. In view of the above, Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
SONALI Digitally signedby SONALI SATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: 2023.02.03 KILAJE 11:28:52 +0530
1 of 1
Shantabai Shamrao Pawar and Anr.
Sindhubai Ranuji Kunjir and Ors
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court