Leave was granted to the petitioner to withdraw the criminal writ petition with liberty to file a discharge application. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.201 OF 2020
Devan Sanjay Sonawane
… PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
… RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.P. Randhir, Advocate petitioner Mr. A.R. Kale, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vinod P. Patil, advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI AND R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2023
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that,
charge is not yet framed. He seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file discharge application. Leave with liberty granted. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
fmp/-
Devan Sanjay Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
Smt. Anuja Prabhudes sai
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
