Disposed

Shivaji Ramchandra Patil v. State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC19 Apr 2023WP/199/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of Consent Minutes submitted by the petitioner and respondent no.3, accepting the payment of dues and withdrawal of the show cause notice as a full and final settlement of the dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of Consent Minutes; interim order made absolute; no orders for costs.

Shivaji Ramchandra Patil Vs State of Goa, Thr. the… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

903-WP-199-21.DOC

¶2

Santosh

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.199 OF 2021

¶4

Shivaji Ramchandra Patil,
Son of Late Ramchandra Patil, Age 64 years of
age Ex-Headmaster, Shri Durga English
School, Parsem, Pernem Goa, r/o House No.
977/D, Subhadra Niwas, Costawado, Siolim,
Bardez Goa 403517

¶5

… Petitioner.

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State of Goa,

¶8

Through the Chief Secretary for State of Goa,
Goa State Secretariat, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa

¶9

2. The Director of Education Directorate of
Education, Porvorim, Bardez, Goa

¶10

3. Shri. Durga English School,
Parsem, Pernem, Goa,
Though its Chairman,
Parsem, Pernem,Goa

¶11

…Respondents.

¶12

Mr Sarvadnya D. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶13

Mr Deep Shirodkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2.

¶14

Mr S.S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Mr Kapil Kerkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

¶15

CORAM : M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.

¶16

DATE : 19^th APRIL 2023

¶17

Page 1 of 3 19/04/23

¶18

903-WP-199-21.DOC

¶19

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per M.S. SONAK, J.)

¶20

1. The learned Counsel for the parties hand in Consent Minutes of the Order. The Minutes are signed by the Advocate for the Petitioner and Respondent No.3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent No.3 state that the Minutes are prepared after explaining the parties to whom they represent, the scope and import. The Minutes are prepared based on express consent of the Petitioner and Respondent No.3.

¶21

2. By our detailed interim order dated 5/1/2021, we had stayed the order dated 12/11/2020 and further directed the School Management to comply with the Director of Education's order dated 8/7/2020 benefiting the Petitioner.

¶22

3. The learned Counsel for the parties point out that the Petitioner has now retired from the service. He has received the benefits in terms of the Director's Order. In order to give quietus to the litigation, the Petitioner has also decided not to insist upon any interest on the dues which are already paid to him. The Management has also considered the matter from this perspective and decided to give a quietus by withdrawing the show cause notice 3/9/2020 and the order 12/11/2020.

¶23

4. Accordingly, the Consent Minutes of the Order are accepted and marked as “X” for the purpose of identification.

¶24

Page 2 of 3 19/04/23

¶25

903-WP-199-21.DOC

¶26

5. At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent No.3, the Petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes. The statements made in the Consent Minutes are accepted as undertakings to this Court. Even the interim order made on 5/1/2021 is made absolute.

¶27

6. Accordingly, the Rule is disposed of in the above terms, without any orders for costs.

¶28

VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. M. S. SONAK, J.

¶29

SANTOSH Digitally signed by SANTOSH S MHAMAL S MHAMAL Date: 2023.04.19 18:17:00 +05'30'

¶30

Page 3 of 3 19/04/23

Shivaji Ramchandra Patil v. State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivaji Ramchandra Patil v. State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fomento Resources Private Limited Rep by Director Shankar Narayan Vs State of Goa Thr. Chief Secretary and 2 Ors.

Deepika Keshi and 4 Ors. Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and 5 Ors.

Mormugao Port Authority Vs Tukaram Manoj Parab and 4 Ors.

People for Animals Goa Thr, Its President Norma Alvares Vs the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden and 7 Ors.

S. P. Mohan Kumar Vs Union of India, Rep. by the Standing Counsel, Panjim and 5 Ors.

People for Animals Goa Thr, Its President Norma Alvares Vs the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden and 6 Ors.