Dismissed

Suhas Kulkarni and 15 Ors. v. Union of India and 5 Ors.

Bombay HC18 Jan 2023WP/1946/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court was asked to address preliminary objections regarding alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The bench opted not to consider the writ petition on merits and disposed of it with liberty to avail the alternate remedy.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with liberty to petitioners to avail alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

Suhas Kulkarni and 15 Ors. Vs Union of India and 5 Ors. — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

18-WP-1946-2019

¶2

Pdp

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1946 OF 2019

¶5

Digitally signed byPRAVIN PRAVINDASHARATH DASHARATHPANDIT PANDIT Date: 2023.01.19 09:58:27 +0530

¶6

Suhas Kulkarni & Ors. .. Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Vaibhav Joglekar & Mr. H. W. Kane a/w Mr. Ajaraj Bagwe and mr. Kanishk Agarwal i/by W. S. Kane & Co. for petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Neel Helekar i/by Mayuresh Lagu for respondents/UoI.

¶11

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ. & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶12

DATE: JANUARY 18, 2023

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

1. The learned advocate for the respondents/Union of India raises preliminary objection that the petitioners have remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal. 2. In light of that, we are not inclined to consider the writ petition on merits.

¶15

3. The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy. In that event, all contentions are kept open. No costs.

¶16

4. Considering the fact that the issue involved is pending since long time, the Tribunal may consider the request of the petitioner to decide the proceedings expeditiously.

¶17

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶18

Suhas Kulkarni and 15 Ors. v. Union of India and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suhas Kulkarni and 15 Ors. v. Union of India and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Prakashrao Dhanage and Ors. Vs Maharashtra Public Service Commission Thr the Secretarya and Anr.

Kunal Ravindra Bhavsar and Ors. Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Sec. Home Dept. and Anr.

Sanjay Ashok Khandare and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sanjay Pralhad Jadhav Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary Tribal Developemtn Dept. and Ors.

Paresh Chandrakant Ghare Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Ms. Manisha Shivaji Marbhal Vs the Union of India Thr the Principal Secretary Ministry of Defence and Anr.