Rahul Sukhdev Meshram and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners did not appear to pursue the criminal writ petition. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DAE 17-WP-1916-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1916 OF 2021
Rahul Sukhdev Meshram And Ors ...Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr ...Respondents
None for Petitioners.
Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.
Digitally signed by DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE ASHOK ETHAPE Date: 2023.04.20 19:15:17 +0530
P.C.:-
DATE : 19th APRIL 2023.
1. None appears for Petitioners. Even on earlier occasion i.e. on 24th November 2022, none had appeared for Petitioners.
It appears that, Petitioners are not interested in pursuing present
Petition.
2. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Rahul Sukhdev Meshram And Ors
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
A. S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court