Writ petition disposed of in light of petitioner's assurance to file a separate amendment application to cure technical irregularities in a previous application rejected by the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
69-wp-1903-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1903 OF 2019
SANJAY CHANDRAKANT SIDANKAR VERSUS
SURYAKANT BABURAO SIDANKAR AND OTHERS
Smt. Anjali Dube (Bajpai), Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 1a to 1d.
Mr. P. B. Shirsath, Advocate for Respondent No.16. Mr. Vishnu Kande h/f Mr. P. K. Phale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.18a to 18c.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 07th FEBRUARY, 2023.
PER COURT:-
(2) 69-wp-1903-2019
petitioner to prefer an appropriate application before the Trial Court, which will be considered by the Trial Court on its own merits and in accordance with law.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH) JUDGE
Devendra/February-2023
SANJAY CHANDRAKANT SIDANKAR
SURYAKANT BABURAO SIDANKAR AND OTHERS
SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court